Casey Means‘ Controversial U.S. Surgeon General Nomination
Table of Contents
BUCHAREST — May 12, 2025 —
In May of 2025, then-President Donald Trump nominated Dr. Casey Means to become the U.S. Surgeon General, a move that immediately stirred controversy. The nomination of Means, a figure known for her critical views on the medical industry and stance against vaccination mandates, has triggered notable debate. This nomination, which followed the withdrawal of another candidate, is seen as a reflection of the evolving viewpoints within the political landscape. Critics question the competence of Dr. Means, while supporters see her as bringing fresh perspectives to the role. The ensuing discussion promises to shape public health discourse; read on to learn more.
Casey Means: A Controversial Pick for U.S. Surgeon General?
May 12, 2025

Teh Nomination: A Bold move
In may 2025, President Donald Trump nominated Dr. Casey Means for the position of U.S. Surgeon General. This role is symbolically significant, acting as a spokesperson for public health and influencing health policy across the nation.
President Trump praised Dr. Means as brave, visionary, and predicted she will be one of the best surgies general in American history.
This nomination followed the withdrawal of dr. Janette Nesheiwat, whose medical qualifications faced criticism.
A Career Path Less Traveled
Born in 1987, Dr. Means graduated at the top of her class in human biology and earned her medical degree from Stanford University in 2014. She initially practiced medicine at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland.
However, in 2018, she left the profession, stating that the health system did not deal with treated diseases, but promoted it.
This marked a turning point in her career, leading her to co-found Levels Health, a health technology company.
She is also the author of „Good Energy: The Surprising Connection Between Metabolism and Limitless Health“ (2024), a book touted as a revolutionary guide to personal health and a bestseller.
Controversial Stances
Dr.Means holds several controversial views that have drawn both support and criticism. She opposes the vaccination obligation
for infants and critiques medical school curricula influenced by the pharmaceutical industry,claiming they are no real medicine
and manipulate and create diseases for profit.
Her skepticism extends to the broader medical industry,as evidenced by her statement: From the time in which we are in the womb,the pharmaceutical industry makes us lifelong customers. It does not heal us,it makes us dependent.
Reactions and Repercussions
president Trump’s nomination of Dr. Means was met with immediate resistance from medical organizations and the media. A primary concern was that Dr. Means’ medical license had lapsed in 2024.
Critics also questioned her professional competence and accused her of spreading conspiracy theories against vaccinations.
Conversely, supporters view Dr. Means as a Truth
and a brave voice in an era of the commercialization of medicine.
Her nomination is also seen as reflecting the influence of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on the government. Trump reportedly told reporters that he was followed by the recommendation of Bobby (Robert F. Kennedy Jr.).
Health Minister Robert defended Dr. Means, telling Forbes that Casey is the perfect choice for the post of the Surgeon General, simply because it has left the conventional health system and does not depend on it.